Red Sixty Seven features our most vulnerable bird species, beautifully illustrated by some amazing wildlife artists. All of the publishers profits from the sale of this book will be donated to BTO and RSPB to further their work on red listed birds.
Contributors include Chris Packham, Ann Cleeves, David Lindo, and Patrick Barkham.
This book should not exist.
In an ideal world this book, and the official Red List of the most vulnerable birds in the UK it is based on, would not be needed. But the world is far from ideal and our bird populations are declining at an alarming rate. In the past few years alone the once widespread Wryneck has ceased breeding in the UK altogether and has dropped off the list completely. Which species will be next?
Editor, Kit Jewitt has taken some time to answer a few questions about the Red Sixty Seven book project and the list itself.
Of all the birds on the Red List which do you think is most vulnerable?
If I had to choose one, it would be the Hen Harrier. Not only do they have to deal with all of the natural challenges they face, they also have to contend with persecution from criminals within the grouse shooting industry, which evidence now suggests is the main cause of their decline in numbers. The fact that 72% of tagged Hen Harriers are confirmed or considered likely to have been illegally killed is a national disgrace. However, in terms of the recent rate of decline I would also suggest Turtle Dove is a species of highest concern.
Many people will be surprised to see herring gull on the list, could you expand on how this seemingly ubiquitous bird has made the list?
Herring Gull populations in coastal areas have dropped by over 50% in my lifetime. This is largely due to the lack of food at coastal sites, with overfishing of UK coastal waters and warming seas caused by climate change likely to be the main reasons for the reduced amount of food available to gulls and other seabirds. They are adaptable, intelligent birds though, so moving to inland areas, or areas where humans create waste for them to eat has been a way for some populations to survive.
Have any birds managed to move away from the Red List to Amber over the last year or so, and which birds are the most recent additions?
Nineteen species were added to the red list for the first time when it was last updated in 2015, and one species, Merlin, moved back onto the list. Breeding seabirds, such as Puffin, Kittiwake and Shag are now included, and with the additions of species such as Woodcock, Nightingale and Pied Flycatcher there are now more woodland birds on the list than any other habitat. Two species, Bittern and Nightjar, have moved from the red to amber lists thanks to the creation and management of suitable habitat, stimulated by species action plans.
We know how we as individuals can help garden birds, but the list contains a high proportion of iconic water birds. How can we as individuals help preserve the many waders and ducks that are on the list?
Many projects being conducted by BTO, RSPB WWT and others help waders, seabirds and ducks, so fundraising for these is vitally important. My main motivation behind the Red Sixty Seven project was to do something to help these declining birds, by spreading the word and raising money for conservationists on the ground. By highlighting the red list far and wide, more people will care and will then hopefully start their own fundraising for BTO’s Operation Wader or Curlew appeal, or WWTs Black-tailed Godwits appeal, or whichever scheme chimes with them. I can’t run marathons or undertake extreme endurance like my friend Jonny Rankin, who has raised over £19,000 for Turtle Doves, so I had to think of a different way of fundraising!
Farmland bird species also make up a large part of the list. Can you see any hope for securing the future of our most rapidly declining farmland species?
The change in farming and land management practices over the last 40 years, including the use of pesticides and changes in crops grown have ultimately reduced the amount of appropriate habitat, and food sources for our farmland birds. Post Brexit, there is an opportunity for the government to make changes to policy to help our farmland wildlife. I just hope they take full advantage of it.
We love the idea of using the power of beautiful words and paintings to deliver a conservation message. Do you think that engaging the reader emotionally can result in more concrete conservation actions being taken?
I hope so! As well as raising funds for crucial work to help red-listed species, I hope Red Sixty Seven brings the list and the plight of these birds to a wider audience, inspiring other people to take action themselves, whatever that might be. The artwork and stories within the book bring home the message in a very accessible way, and you are left under no illusion that we must do something. There is a poignant sting in the tale at the end of the book; an ‘In Memoriam’ section devoted to the birds we have lost as breeding species in recent years. This book is a call-to-arms.
All of the publisher’s profits from the sale of this book will be donated to BTO and RSPB to further their work on red listed birds.
Red Sixty Seven: A Collection of Words and Art Inspired by Britain’s Most Vulnerable Birds
Hardback, published February 2020 £19.99
Red Sixty Seven is 67 love letters to our most vulnerable species, each beautifully illustrated by some of the best wildlife artists around.
I agree with most of this but would suggest…
1. Quite right about illegal persecution of hen harriers and other raptors but the RSPB’s opposition to Defra/Natural England’s plans to boost the species is a little hard to justify if you have the species’ best interests at heart.
2. The thread that runs through much of this is that we don’t know enough about key species to reverse a decline. As a farmer, I am involved in efforts to help restore the turtle dove. The principal difficulty is that we just don’t know enough about them so that we have difficulty pinning down the causes of decline which include lack of food on arrival from migration, nest predation and shooting of migratory birds en route. Formulating an effective action plan is therefore a problem. Research is needed desperately.
3. While the BTO is a first rate research organisation forever short of funds, the RSPB (I am a member) is very rich indeed. Annual income tops £140m (with an additional £36m sitting in ‘free reserves’) of which only £35m ie 24% goes on ‘Research, Policy & Advisory’ according to their accounts. Given that they spend a great deal of time and money on lobbying etc., we might guess that about half goes on scientific research per se ie 12%. If so, and they don’t give the details, this is far too small a proportion of the budget given the issues that you are talking about.
4. So, in conclusion, I would give all your money to the BTO and give the RSPB a smart kick on the shins for spending too much of their considerable wealth on politics and promotion and not enough on solving the real problems of Red List Species.